As students, you have or will run into something that is AI generated. Or perhaps your instructor has told you to use AI in some way, whether it is you directly interacting with it or the class looking over something AI generated. You may have wanted to use AI in your coursework but were not sure if you should or even how to cite AI (for the former, carefully look over the syllabus and instructions for the assignment. If you are still unsure, email your instructor).
Richard Culatta (2025) states that "In addition to just knowing about AI, students need to practice using AI to think deeper, create better, and solve problems more efficiently than the could on their own". With that in mind, he create the profile of an AI graduate, available from the ASCD Blog. Culatta (2025) centers the profile around six points:
In addition, the Modern Languages Association (MLA) (2024), students become literate users of Generative AI (GenAI) when students:
For more information on these points, check out the MLA Student Guide to AI Literacy.
The above points overlap somewhat but the purpose is clear: use of AI has become the expectation rather than the exception. And this is particularly true in the work force. The Digital Education Council (2025) AI in the workplace 2025 surveyed various organizations. 56% of respondents stated that most employees use AI in the workflow daily, with an additional 29% stating that some employees do (Digital Education Council 2025, p. 6). The Digital Education Council (2025) also reports that, currently, "AI in the workplace is still primarily serving as an assistant to human work, rather than replacing it" (p. 9), further breaking down the tasks that AI is being used for. These tasks include but are not limited to drafting and editing emails, summarizing documents, information searches, and more. However, the Digital Education Council (2025) predicts an 8% job loss by 2030 (p. 12) and the jobs most likely to be affected are public relations and marketing roles as well as data analytics (p. 13). Finally, many organizations do not provide or offer guidelines to their employees (Digital Education Council, 2025, p. 20). This last part is where Canisius steps in. By providing students opportunities to use AI in a directed, educated way, students can begin to check off the points from Culatta (2025) and MLA Style Center (2024). This, in turn, sets students up for success in the everchanging landscape of the AI-fueled workforce.
As mentioned above, we may use AI to make a point and, therefore, will need to cite AI. Below are guides on how to cite AI:
If we are still unsure how to cite AI in our work, we can either Book a Librarian or Contact Library Staff.
As a final word of caution: do not assume that AI can be used in the assignment unless told, specifically, that it can be. If you are unsure, re-read the assignment instructions, the course syllabus, and/or contact your instructor directly.
Culatta, R. (2025, July 14). Profile of an ai-ready graduate. ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/blogs/profile-of-an-ai-ready-graduate
Digital Education Council. (2025, July 28). AI in the Workplace 2025. https://www.digitaleducationcouncil.com/post/ai-in-the-workplace-2025
MLA Style Center. (2024). Student guide to ai literacy. MLA Style Center. https://style.mla.org/student-guide-to-ai-literacy/